Key findings
- ClinicalTrials.gov lists 262 1 interventional gene-editing studies; 131 2 are active and 11 3 are Phase 3.
- 133 4 started between January 2023 and September 2026: 54 5 with a China site and 54 6 with a US site.
- Base-editing studies number 35 7 of the new starts, and in vivo liver-editing studies 10 8.
- Cancer (36 9) and sickle cell disease or beta-thalassaemia (18 10) are the largest indication groups since 2023.
Momentum: small numbers, fast growth
Gene-editing trial starts rose from 14 11 in 2020 to 27 12 in 2023 and 40 13 in 2024, then 35 14 in 2025. The numbers are small because each programme is expensive and manufacturing-intensive.
China's rise is the main geographic change. Studies with a China site went from 3 15 in 2020 to 13 16 in 2023 and 14 17 in 2025, matching the United States (15 18 in 2025). Chinese base-editing companies such as CorrectSequence, and hospital-led programmes in thalassaemia, drive much of this. Global cell and gene therapy spending reached $5.9 billion in 2023 19, still a small share of medicine spending.
Gene-editing trial starts more than doubled, with China level with the US
Interventional gene editing studies by start year; a study with sites in both countries counts in both lines
View the underlying data
| Series | Period | Type | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| All studies | 2025 | Actual | 35 |
| All studies | 2024 | Actual | 40 |
| All studies | 2023 | Actual | 27 |
| All studies | 2022 | Actual | 23 |
| All studies | 2021 | Actual | 17 |
| All studies | 2020 | Actual | 14 |
| With a US site | 2025 | Actual | 15 |
| With a US site | 2024 | Actual | 17 |
| With a US site | 2023 | Actual | 10 |
| With a US site | 2022 | Actual | 13 |
| With a US site | 2021 | Actual | 8 |
| With a US site | 2020 | Actual | 8 |
| With a China site | 2025 | Actual | 14 |
| With a China site | 2024 | Actual | 17 |
| With a China site | 2023 | Actual | 13 |
| With a China site | 2022 | Actual | 4 |
| With a China site | 2021 | Actual | 2 |
| With a China site | 2020 | Actual | 3 |
Live registry counts retrieved 2026-09-27. Studies registered only outside ClinicalTrials.gov, including many China-only trials, are not counted.
Approaches
Edited cell therapies. CRISPR- or TALEN-edited CAR-T and TCR-T cells appear in 42 30 studies started since 2023. Editing is used to make allogeneic products, to knock out checkpoints or to add safety switches.
Base editing. Base editors change a single DNA letter without cutting both strands. They appear in 35 7 new studies, more than any other single technique, including Beam's programmes and several Chinese thalassaemia programmes. In 2025 a team in Philadelphia treated an infant with a personalised base-editing therapy for CPS1 deficiency, a rare urea-cycle disorder (NEJM), showing that bespoke editing is feasible.
Ex vivo stem-cell editing for sickle cell disease and beta-thalassaemia appears in 18 31 new studies. In vivo liver editing with lipid nanoparticles appears in 10 8, including Intellia's Phase 3 programmes in transthyretin amyloidosis and hereditary angioedema and CRISPR Therapeutics' lipid-lowering programmes.
Edited cell therapies and base editing lead new gene-editing trials
Interventional studies started since January 2023, by asset or class; a study can count in more than one bar
View the underlying data
| Category | Source | Type | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gene-edited CAR-T or TCR-T | ClinicalTrials.gov | Actual | 42 |
| Base editing | ClinicalTrials.gov | Actual | 35 |
| Ex vivo edited stem cells (sickle cell, thalassaemia) | ClinicalTrials.gov | Actual | 18 |
| In vivo liver editing (LNP) | ClinicalTrials.gov | Actual | 10 |
Live registry counts retrieved 2026-09-27. Name and code matching can miss studies registered under other identifiers.
Indications
Cancer is listed in 36 9 gene-editing studies started since 2023, mostly for edited cell therapies. Sickle cell disease and beta-thalassaemia follow with 18 10, and inherited liver and metabolic diseases with 17 32. Inherited eye disease accounts for 5 33.
The shift from blood disorders to liver disease matters commercially. Ex vivo editing needs stem-cell collection, chemotherapy conditioning and a hospital stay, which limits uptake. A one-time infusion that edits liver cells could treat common conditions such as high cholesterol, and not only rare diseases.
Cancer and blood disorders lead; inherited liver disease is rising
Interventional studies started since January 2023, by condition; a study can count in more than one bar
View the underlying data
| Category | Source | Type | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cancer | ClinicalTrials.gov | Actual | 36 |
| Sickle cell disease or beta-thalassaemia | ClinicalTrials.gov | Actual | 18 |
| Inherited liver and metabolic disease | ClinicalTrials.gov | Actual | 17 |
| Inherited eye disease | ClinicalTrials.gov | Actual | 5 |
Live registry counts retrieved 2026-09-27. Name and code matching can miss studies registered under other identifiers.
Approvals and deals
The FDA approved Casgevy (exagamglogene autotemcel), the first CRISPR-based medicine, for sickle cell disease on 8 December 2023 (FDA announcement). It later added transfusion-dependent beta-thalassaemia. No in vivo gene-editing therapy is approved yet.
Large companies are buying rather than building. Eli Lilly completed its acquisition of Verve Therapeutics in July 2025 (Lilly) to gain its in vivo base-editing programmes for cardiovascular disease.
What it means for founders and R&D teams
- In vivo delivery beyond the liver is the key problem. Lipid nanoparticles reach the liver well. Muscle, brain, lung and blood-stem-cell delivery in vivo remain open, and whoever solves one owns a platform.
- Base and prime editing are the preferred tools. Their safety profile, with no double-strand breaks, suits common diseases where the risk tolerance is low.
- Pick diseases where one treatment replaces a lifetime of therapy. The economic case is strongest where a one-time edit replaces chronic, costly treatment, such as lipid disorders, hereditary angioedema and haemoglobin disorders.
- China is competitive in thalassaemia and base editing. Local disease prevalence and fast investigator-initiated studies give Chinese companies data sooner. Partnerships are a natural route to global markets.
Methodology and limitations
Every trial count is the totalCount of one ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 query, retrieved on 26 September 2026. Each numbered citation opens a record whose source link re-runs the query. The track includes interventional studies whose record mentions CRISPR, Cas9 or Cas12, base or prime editing, zinc-finger nucleases, TALENs or a named gene-editing product.
Counts are small. Approach bars overlap: an edited CAR-T made with a base editor counts in both. Site-country counts overlap, and China-only registrations are missing. Approvals, the 2025 personalised treatment and acquisitions are based on FDA and company announcements and published reports; the global spending figure is cited to its publisher.
Data behind this report
The industry hubs and indicator series these figures come from. Each page carries the full table, every source and the records this report does not quote.
Industry hubs
Indicator series
- Gene editing trial starts 21
- Active gene editing trials 1
- Cell and gene therapy spending 1
- Gene editing trial starts since 2023: Cancer 1
- Gene editing trial starts since 2023: Inherited eye disease 1
- Gene editing trial starts since 2023: Inherited liver and metabolic disease 1
- Gene editing trial starts since 2023: Sickle cell disease or beta-thalassaemia 1
- Phase 3 gene editing trials 1
- Registered interventional gene editing trials 1
- Trial starts since 2023: Base editing 1
- Trial starts since 2023: Ex vivo edited stem cells (sickle cell, thalassaemia) 1
- Trial starts since 2023: Gene-edited CAR-T or TCR-T 1
- Trial starts since 2023: In vivo liver editing (LNP) 1
Sources
Every figure in this report is a published StatOrigin record. The table lists the 33 cited statistics. Sort any column or download CSV. Open a record for APA, MLA, Chicago or BibTeX.
Cite this report
StatOrigin. (2026). Gene editing in the clinic: from ex vivo cures to one-time in vivo treatments. https://statorigin.org/reports/gene-editing-clinical-pipeline-2026
Prefer citing the underlying statistic when you only need one figure. Published 26 September 2026 · updated 27 September 2026. Data licence: CC BY 4.0.